Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  105 / 121 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 105 / 121 Next Page
Page Background

103

Headway made in combating discrimination

Assessment of the Criminal Code reform

The Organic Law reforming the Criminal Code intro-

duces important amendments and one of the most

noteworthy has to do with the very structure of the

Code, i.e. the elimination of Book III corresponding to

misdemeanours.

The Equal Treatment and Anti-discrimination Depart-

ment would like to say a few words about this most

recent reform of the Criminal Code, highlighting some

articles relating to racial or ethnic discrimination and

hate crime.

1.

Discrimination on the basis gender as an aggravating

circumstance with criminal liability has been introdu-

ced (CC Article 22[4]);

2.

The crime of harassment or stalking is now descri-

bed and regulated (CC Article 172[b]);

3.

Misdemeanours have been eliminated such that the

current misdemeanour of making threats is now a

minor crime (CC Article 171[7]) and the misdemeanour

of coercion is now also a minor crime (Article 172[3]);

4.

Minor incidences of slander and unfair humiliation are

no longer considered criminal offences except in ca-

ses of gender-based violence where they are listed

as minor crimes (CC Article 173[4]);

5.

We would draw special attention to CC Article 510

regarding incitement to hatred, violence or discrimi-

nation and CC Article 607(2) on the dissemination of

ideas justifying genocide which have been merged.

The new version of this Article, which features verbs

such as “foster, promote and incite” (CC Article 510[a]),

is clearly a major legislative change and will enable more

effective persecution of this type of crime and will also

extend action in criminal proceedings thus circumvent-

ing problems of interpretation. We are also satisfied to

see the inclusion of natural persons as victims of the

offence.

Regarding the glorification of genocide it states as fol-

lows: “Those who publicly negate, seriously trivialise or

glorify crimes of genocide and crimes against human-

ity shall be sentenced to between one and four years

imprisonment and a fine of between six and twelve

months.” (CC Article 510[c])

Regarding Internet crimes, CC Article 510(3) provides

that the upper half of the sentences envisaged in the

preceding sub-paragraphs be applied where these acts

are perpetrated through social media, over the Inter-

net or through information technology, i.e. acts made

accessible to a large group of people. It likewise pro-

vides that the judge or court shall order the destruc-

tion, deletion or cancellation of books, files, documents,

articles and all other media used in the commission of

the crimes referred to in the preceding sub-paragraphs.

Where the offence is committed through information

and communication technologies, content shall be re-

moved. In cases where the sort of content referred to

in the preceding paragraph is the only or accounts for

most of the information disseminated through an Inter-

net portal or information society service, an order must

be issued to block access to or discontinue that site.

These articles will facilitate the persecution of hate

speech on the Internet and social networks, speech that

frequently targets the Roma community